slight progress - LaStampa.it [El Mundo] are many and varied reasons why Silvio Berlusconi provokes a strong interest. Here are some: I am 15 years dominating the Italian political scene, was elected in April for the third time prime minister with a landslide victory that gave it an absolute majority, is one of the richest men in the world by being the owner of a media empire which includes three of the four private television channels that exist in Italy, has had numerous problems with the law, enjoys huge popularity, and owner of AC Milan, one of the football teams that have won more international titles, has not shown its minimally 72 years of age ... The 'Knight' experiencing a golden moment. With the opposition center-left in agony and the support of over 60% of Italians have little reason not to get excited.
Response. - Capitalism is still the best when compared with those based collectivist ideology that condemned entire populations to poverty and lack of freedom. But some rules, especially in the financial field, must be changed. [...] It is capitalism to be in the dock, but the degeneration of certain aspects of the free market.
D. - She has swept the parliamentary elections and its popularity is now at stratospheric levels. Because the Italians love it so much?
R. - With the current crisis, enjoy a popularity among the 64% and 73% seems to me quite frankly embarrassing. Can only diminish! [...] The Italians have always known me. They trust me because I was the most popular and coveted Italian businessman and I dropped everything to make available to my country and my fellow citizens of my experience and my abilities. They were tired of the talk of the Left, demanded action.
D. - How do you interpret her right man, the crisis of the Italian left? He is happy to govern practically without opposition?
R. - I regret having to correct. I'm not a man of the right. The reason for the broad consensus of which I enjoy in Italy is due to the fact that the old ideologies no longer matter. Anyone who insists to serve as ambassadors, shall be punished by a vote. [...] The left is still under the blackmail of environmental fanaticism. If he won he would continue to lose precious time before tackling the country's energy policy. Under the blackmail of local authorities, could never solve the problem of waste. Under the union hostage by the minority would never have agreed to apply the criteria of meritocracy in public administration and education. However, the [...] crisis, the opposition can not please anyone. Indeed, it is worrying. The role of the minority in a democracy is essential and must be able to engage in a constructive manner. Unfortunately, the crisis of the Italian opposition seems destined to last long.
D. - Changing the subject, because his government is committed to prevent the death of Eluana, the woman who had spent 17 years in a coma and died on February 9 after that, in compliance with a ruling of the Supreme Court, I am artificial nutrition and hydration withdrawn?
R. - A democratically elected government has the right and duty to make decisions. Morality can be subjective, the law no. Especially on key issues, such as that which concerns life and death, we can not leave regulatory gaps, because of these shortcomings problems arise. The judiciary, unlike the Parliament has no power to make laws, but has the honor to apply them. If there are gaps, the task of filling it to Parliament. And given that in Italy there was no law on living wills and on interruption of life, quite naturally we brought our proposals in Parliament, giving freedom to our MPs to vote according to their conscience. Let me remind you that in the case of Eluana no treatment was discontinued, did not put an end to aggressive treatment. He simply wanted to deny food, water and a sick woman, and hence the need and urgency of a bill of the government so that Parliament could adopt or reject, and that judges could apply.
D. - One of the first laws passed by his government was the Lodo Alfano, a rule of law that grants immunity to the four main offices of the Italian State and that has been labeled by the opposition center-left as a law ad personam ", created for avoid problems with the judiciary. Do you think that as prime minister should set an example and be the first to submit to Justice?
R. - The law to which it relates is born from a need precisely indicated by the Italian Constitutional Court: the need to allow the highest office in the State to perform its mandate fully and peacefully. In Italy, the principle of "due process" requires the full participation of the accused at the hearing. In a process that takes two or three years, with two or three hearings per week, it is virtually impossible for those engaged in high and important institutional functions participate and defend themselves. The mechanism of immunity is well known in other countries, including Spain, which also extends to members of parliament and is much stronger that in Italy, where the process is simply outstanding. [...] Unfortunately, part of the Italian judiciary is politicized, has used and continues to use his power as a weapon of political struggle against his opponents, especially against the only politician that can be imposed on the left. The politicized courts have also tried to alter the outcome of the democratic vote, succeeding in 1994 with a charge from which I of course was later acquitted after a trial of 10 years. The recall only some of the data: between 1994 and 2006, 789 judges have dealt with Silvio Berlusconi, with investigations and prosecutions that led to 587 visits by police and the Guardia di Finanza and 2500 hearings, a world record! Conclusion: I have always been declared innocent because, fortunately, the impartial judges are still the majority.
D. - The Italian anti-immigration policy has been much criticized, even by some members of the English Government. Some, in fact, have accused his government of xenophobia, particularly against immigrants Romanian gypsies. How do you respond to these criticisms?
R. - Our policy on immigration is not "against," she says. It is not against immigration altogether. We have the utmost respect for those who come to Italy to improve their lives and their families with an honest job, a thousand sacrifices and within the law. On the contrary, we maintain a firm stance against those who enter Italy illegally and live crime or small tricks and show no willingness to integrate. [...] As for the Romanians, who are European citizens, France has expelled thousands in 2008 alone. At the same time, Italy is only 40.
D. - But you, who claims to be a man-made man, do not try to enter Italy as an illegal immigrant if born in a third world country and be poor?
R. - I, like I said, I appreciate those who honestly try to build a future for themselves and their children integrated in another country. But I still most estimates of those who decide not to abandon their land and, in doing so, contribute with their work and their initiative to make it grow, by serving their community. I'm not left for the United States to work as an entrepreneur, I have been here.
D. - Enel is at this moment, which owns 92% of Endesa, the largest English electricity company. However, each time a English company has tried to invest in Italy is not failed. He does not believe that in this sense there is a large imbalance between the two countries? Do you not think that Italy sins of excessive protectionism?
R. - Our government has never intervened or intervene in the affairs of private companies. So, for our part, there is no protectionist behavior. In contrast, investment and firms in other countries, particularly Spain, are welcome in Italy.
[Original article by Irene Hdez. Velasco]
Italy from abroad