Of all the animals that live between the pages of books disicio the worm is the most harmful. None of his colleagues in the matches. Maiofaga even the bug, which eats its case or the farfalo, a small wasp that eats the double with a preference for 'em "and" year old ", and is fond of words like" nothing "and" breast ".
Rather annoying is the termite punctuation, or termite Dublin, gnawing semicolons causes torrential famous period, cross and delight of the proto and the critic.
univerbo Very rare is the spider, so called because it feeds only the verb "propellers." This spider is now only in old texts of law, because that word is in use and expired a few examples that reappear are decimated by the spider. I will also mention two
biblioanimali quite common: the subjunctive and the flea fly apocope. The first eat all the people of the subjunctive, with preference for the first plural. Some newspaper articles that seem ungrammatical are being ravaged by the flea of \u200b\u200bthe subjunctive (or so say the press). The apocope sucks "and" final verbs (amar, swimming, walking). In the nineteenth century there were millions of copies, now the species is very small.
But as we said at the beginning of all biblioanimali the worm or worm disicio barter is certainly the most damaging. He strikes mostly towards the end of the story. It takes a word and carries in place of another, and put it instead of just. Shifts are minimal, sometimes you just move the first three words or worm, but the result is logical. The story loses all its devastating and malignant only after a survey can be reconstructed as it was before the worm dell'augurio disicio.
So the worm acts as if by instinct or nature of his accurate we can not hate literature. We know you only action: Do not you ever ever come across a page where you passed the four disicio.
(Adapted from: Stefano Benni, "The bar sotto il mare", 1988)
0 comments:
Post a Comment